{"id":"W2030716795","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11171","title":"A likelihood ratio test for goodness‐of‐fit of recessive and dominant models for case–control studies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Cancer Institute; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Likelihood-ratio test; Statistics; Test statistic; Econometrics; Null hypothesis; Genetic model; Statistic; Score test; Population; Null distribution; Statistical hypothesis testing; Type I and type II errors; Mathematics; Demography; Biology; Genetics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08858389,0.001262099,0.003739921,0.006929248,0.0008993149,0.002570566,0.004960898,0.003480739,0.01114267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3915572,0.0008410032,0.003926759,0.006499228,0.00483142,0.00389115,0.002503875,0.003544447,0.001368605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001355567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002849464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002464343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001001659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8469338,0.1260194,0.006726642,0.008734033,0.01047487,0.001111179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4772366,0.4864655,0.01348993,0.01508294,0.00599481,0.001730161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004334459,0.000675773,0.3014999,0.003092276,0.0129685,0.005711536,0.001772795,0.03842045,0.004577793,0.220328,0.02315053,0.383468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002500255,0.005284979,0.1271869,0.001012181,0.003730885,0.0127858,0.001582464,0.4104104,0.004481513,0.4062357,0.0240974,0.0006915913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05759183,0.001988547,0.931035,0.001947879,0.0004073751,0.0006750649,0.001729325,0.001139382,0.003485566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6698639,0.0005975273,0.321703,0.0008696524,0.000547037,0.002279484,0.002059929,0.0004322589,0.001647255],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08858389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.468482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02789842037664118,"score_gpt":0.2801667391640135,"score_spread":0.2522683187873723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}