{"id":"W2030893700","doi":"10.1155/2011/389518","title":"Law′s Dilemma: Validating Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the Clash of Evidential Paradigms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine","topic":"Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dilemma; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Management science; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Economics; Engineering; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002809705,0.000769051,0.00174762,0.0003947017,0.0007882612,0.00003826999,0.0004768447,0.00003585094,0.002055277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009165653,0.0004660015,0.0001401848,0.0003650983,0.008025097,0.0005331605,0.00064825,0.0009384166,0.000002301688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006453683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006731845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01318026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001382103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947599,0.000607854,0.001584704,0.001036662,0.001354678,0.0006562542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920636,0.005622138,0.0008315325,0.0006046033,0.0004238111,0.0004543616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0121686,0.0007692389,0.4535468,0.0028765,0.005443348,0.0006212352,0.02704768,0.00003094486,0.05543648,0.3659135,0.008467028,0.06767859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2612795,0.04235467,0.2764722,0.04291769,0.01322721,0.001959065,0.05983496,0.03284822,0.04025679,0.07085472,0.1537066,0.004288337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325355,0.00557191,0.0008043487,0.05652173,0.001225654,0.00211013,0.0001381102,0.00005429377,0.001038321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857877,0.003126979,0.00114586,0.006629135,0.002892898,0.0001198213,0.0002027122,0.00004402434,0.00005082538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2950588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.123415283145198,"score_gpt":0.3764338294720068,"score_spread":0.2530185463268089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}