{"id":"W2031019245","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.012","title":"Essential work of fracture and failure mechanisms of polypropylene–clay nanocomposites","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Polypropylene; Ultimate tensile strength; Nanocomposite; Microstructure; Exfoliation joint; Void (composites); Toughness; Fracture toughness; Nanoparticle; Coalescence (physics); Polymer nanocomposite; Intercalation (chemistry); Graphene; Nanotechnology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004704785,0.0004604983,0.0002996898,0.0005974188,0.0004915981,0.0004474455,0.0006254769,0.0005761201,0.001658969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009107526,0.0003252497,0.0004909936,0.0002390798,0.0005324223,0.0008851342,0.0003980277,0.000759304,0.0002791183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004166107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003200111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001165376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005427806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997751,0.00001846666,0.000009583611,0.00005543737,0.0001073863,0.00003411663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999665,0.0001011416,0.00003024272,0.00006035012,0.0001164821,0.00002681762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002502758,0.0001059873,0.00234815,0.0005675189,0.00004922882,0.0004249454,0.0003915658,0.01923705,0.8790983,0.03458443,0.0009375535,0.06200498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001903103,0.0002526382,0.01131123,0.00005383166,0.00005544721,0.0008448601,0.0002149887,0.144829,0.8109579,0.01916338,0.01221411,0.0000834848],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.862532,0.00958706,0.1157273,0.0007481214,0.0002408956,0.00004218169,0.0001825477,0.0001933293,0.01074666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861302,0.001413995,0.006426642,0.00002889134,0.00003715868,0.00001673902,0.0000666154,0.00002913916,0.005850704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001658969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005549848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002396798361594737,"score_gpt":0.1693130993930331,"score_spread":0.1669163010314384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}