{"id":"W2031019245","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.012","title":"Essential work of fracture and failure mechanisms of polypropylene–clay nanocomposites","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Polypropylene; Ultimate tensile strength; Nanocomposite; Microstructure; Exfoliation joint; Void (composites); Toughness; Fracture toughness; Nanoparticle; Coalescence (physics); Polymer nanocomposite; Intercalation (chemistry); Graphene; Nanotechnology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001756646,0.0002854337,0.0004272641,0.0001238347,0.00006363363,0.00004558575,0.0002703026,0.0002264341,0.0001559105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001722619,0.0002328195,0.00009934734,0.0002093186,0.00002962338,0.0001561439,0.00009223032,0.0001856132,0.000004734577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001369831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002550059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001551617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000526922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986442,0.00003057384,0.0004093497,0.0002898805,0.0003040567,0.0003219169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992609,0.00007997396,0.0002149338,0.0003008523,0.00007095116,0.00007240896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003943326,0.00004551427,0.00003447126,0.000141768,0.00001871081,0.000003653961,0.0001183018,0.01363566,0.9814956,0.004235785,0.0001597638,0.00007134268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002538376,0.00009313255,0.000159841,0.0001480234,0.00005213041,0.00001336528,0.00001594438,0.001704772,0.9935201,0.001540994,0.002247002,0.000250867],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5693794,0.00418354,0.4250373,0.0004546422,0.0004298479,0.0002947889,0.00003724138,0.0001562829,0.00002691782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749565,0.00001464164,0.02468146,0.00009363826,0.0001359479,0.000009108989,0.00001461553,0.00004306771,0.00005105494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.405577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002396798361594737,"score_gpt":0.1693130993930331,"score_spread":0.1669163010314384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}