{"id":"W2031037052","doi":"10.1002/rnc.1727","title":"An HMM approach for optimal investment of an insurer","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation; Hidden Markov model; Dynamic programming; Mathematical optimization; Stochastic control; Markov chain; Computer science; Optimal control; Investment (military); Bayesian probability; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490161,0.0004278335,0.001041987,0.0005227856,0.0004142123,0.001117298,0.001128583,0.001479404,0.005684441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003998434,0.0006996685,0.0009791543,0.000395973,0.0008565097,0.001363499,0.001001301,0.001567499,0.0004737836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001888302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001705514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01265385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007137897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993052,0.0002553083,0.00003445446,0.0001787809,0.0001414295,0.00008483386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.000902865,0.0001265827,0.00006358337,0.0001461163,0.00006481197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003594957,0.000021385,0.0006111654,0.00003433513,0.00003447925,0.0001023718,0.00007691875,0.8582553,0.000913773,0.1293581,0.000858082,0.009698112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002698843,0.000005714622,0.0001044829,0.000004737105,0.000004957777,0.000005826633,0.000004409958,0.9834818,0.0000858913,0.01607602,0.0002183623,0.000005136633],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01950963,0.0002146463,0.9749985,0.000758573,0.00003890463,0.00001912207,0.0001133968,0.000124252,0.004222991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893965,0.0004545376,0.09707244,0.0001803755,0.00008501552,0.0001598053,0.0002564929,0.00008039365,0.01231437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01265385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02516043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03824778654092933,"score_gpt":0.3076496078420111,"score_spread":0.2694018213010818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}