{"id":"W2031094616","doi":"10.1115/pvp2011-57834","title":"Ratcheting/Shakedown Analysis of Cracked Structures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 1: Codes and Standards","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Shakedown; Ratchet; Limit (mathematics); Component (thermodynamics); Invariant (physics); Stress (linguistics); Range (aeronautics); Structural engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Materials science; Engineering; Finite element method; Physics; Composite material; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002666714,0.0001294141,0.000316878,0.0001459453,0.00004462389,0.00001723437,0.00008506727,0.00008313671,0.0005716562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004203804,0.0001116113,0.00009625489,0.0003218419,0.00004307426,0.00005690457,0.00002047006,0.00009792807,8.447332e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002762883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002052672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001209309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002272705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992253,0.00001525868,0.0002049193,0.0001293169,0.0002635781,0.0001616913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995488,0.00001609051,0.00003950679,0.0001842876,0.0001483007,0.00006304267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001208579,0.0003781787,0.2423851,0.002531542,0.02971313,0.0001811687,0.08406535,0.0363388,0.07013746,0.0398185,0.08383409,0.4094082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002102977,0.000746624,0.2956584,0.0001639057,0.005449378,0.00001349611,0.002507826,0.4820896,0.08273916,0.009684142,0.1168164,0.002028142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458038,0.001282516,0.04649595,0.00001242819,0.0002148063,0.00008636001,0.0006346282,0.0001358204,0.005333737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997931,0.0002320843,0.001712381,0.00001491714,0.00002079522,0.00000228686,0.00001573053,0.0000159201,0.00005487037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4457508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6259235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01388417015943713,"score_gpt":0.2189096790338362,"score_spread":0.2050255088743991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}