{"id":"W2031196003","doi":"10.1097/icl.0b013e31803c55ad","title":"Biocompatibility of Contact Lens Solutions Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and the In Vitro Bovine Cornea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice","topic":"Ocular Surface and Contact Lens","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Contact lens; Cornea; Biocompatibility; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Materials science; Confocal; Confocal microscopy; Laser; Laser scanning; Lens (geology); Microscopy; Biomedical engineering; Optics; Scanning confocal electron microscopy; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005914854,0.0003616856,0.0002312616,0.0002634392,0.0002302495,0.0004383386,0.0002851303,0.0004189406,0.000984602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004677848,0.0002131725,0.0002458634,0.0002116921,0.0003428906,0.000314824,0.0002301898,0.0002853655,0.0002813728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005848388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003082138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004256818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005091896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996183,0.0000683953,0.00004036212,0.0000930846,0.0001267225,0.00005310167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996089,0.0001099604,0.00008597104,0.00005708846,0.0001185194,0.00001951703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004090474,0.000008637507,0.0002352978,0.000054902,0.000002911526,0.00003368701,0.00003513503,0.00005458489,0.9983712,0.00002562034,0.00001111788,0.00112599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006426387,0.0001780682,0.005037887,0.00001152801,0.00001655579,0.0001878639,0.00003887119,0.0005725545,0.9924745,0.00001416858,0.001454649,0.000006906477],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770796,0.007738181,0.01251762,0.0001173665,0.00003681624,0.00008292001,0.0001951785,0.00007485857,0.002157479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982754,0.002758014,0.01230805,0.00005420242,0.00001279577,0.0001029438,0.0002425337,0.00003285621,0.001734681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004256818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008464098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07645696521650516,"score_gpt":0.4158550939948312,"score_spread":0.339398128778326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}