{"id":"W2031196003","doi":"10.1097/icl.0b013e31803c55ad","title":"Biocompatibility of Contact Lens Solutions Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and the In Vitro Bovine Cornea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice","topic":"Ocular Surface and Contact Lens","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Contact lens; Cornea; Biocompatibility; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Materials science; Confocal; Confocal microscopy; Laser; Laser scanning; Lens (geology); Microscopy; Biomedical engineering; Optics; Scanning confocal electron microscopy; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01896171,0.0003201777,0.001051425,0.0002304657,0.0004803323,0.0001056322,0.0003856644,0.000224943,0.00003697827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01491971,0.0002362142,0.0002782148,0.0009870338,0.002316469,0.001464547,0.000275231,0.001298186,0.00002158321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002611284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001270627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002663534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003228519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949329,0.0005919969,0.00174886,0.000883062,0.0008752834,0.000967921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908848,0.006175221,0.000840419,0.0009595896,0.0007945916,0.0003453383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01792654,0.001535365,0.4102669,0.00007417364,0.000146702,0.0002142952,0.001032613,0.00001658358,0.5615354,0.003336305,0.00002617538,0.003888942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01645895,0.002167851,0.9150079,0.0004815276,0.0007981103,0.0001064124,0.004297465,0.008847824,0.043462,0.00007617311,0.007683377,0.0006123342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892702,0.0007333065,0.001929247,0.003450398,0.0005379912,0.001038541,0.00001808173,0.00004194008,0.002980301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922165,0.0001753184,0.003542708,0.003840855,0.0001507036,0.000004624856,0.000005233235,0.00002315071,0.00004092346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5180734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07645696521650516,"score_gpt":0.4158550939948312,"score_spread":0.339398128778326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}