{"id":"W2031213996","doi":"10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70962-x","title":"Second reading of coronary angiograms by radiologists","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Coronary angiography; Limits of agreement; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Cardiology; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00246048,0.001263194,0.000983917,0.007710357,0.001172862,0.00237625,0.0008158762,0.004052311,0.02449353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02189833,0.0006201285,0.001201696,0.001322247,0.000461061,0.001160021,0.001120026,0.002188836,0.007512493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008717493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008517331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003261829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005204951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960223,0.0009740258,0.0005844269,0.0005466546,0.001192843,0.0006798641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818168,0.005902639,0.00129849,0.00270978,0.006484268,0.001788135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01015092,0.0009535844,0.2971117,0.001023126,0.0005949361,0.1866281,0.003686452,0.0003958837,0.1300417,0.001552013,0.1106724,0.2571893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004407394,0.002096413,0.4087095,0.0006305581,0.0006320216,0.3670507,0.002404216,0.003950635,0.1034365,0.001242581,0.1090639,0.0003423518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7609663,0.01319074,0.0211221,0.01333828,0.008522002,0.0007056722,0.003301167,0.003314364,0.1755394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9015812,0.002710499,0.02703714,0.007154328,0.008038302,0.0001895467,0.003302934,0.001091791,0.04889419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02449353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0819391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008597350406265802,"score_gpt":0.2304626354273038,"score_spread":0.221865285021038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}