{"id":"W2031286453","doi":"10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.07.015","title":"Comparison of the efficiency of five observability indices for robot calibration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanism and Machine Theory","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Observability; Robot; Calibration; Noise (video); Planar; Control theory (sociology); Position (finance); Robot calibration; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Robot control; Mobile robot; Statistics; Applied mathematics; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000279987,0.00008963684,0.0001943531,0.0000240329,0.00004859831,0.000008269242,0.0001296118,0.00005345089,0.00003543501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003894459,0.00005979732,0.00004851033,0.00005861441,0.00003700695,0.00006537548,0.00004289081,0.00005997548,4.162202e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006372351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007357338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004899159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001259457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994531,0.00004193489,0.0002302525,0.00009181258,0.00008217318,0.0001007322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995596,0.0001302718,0.00007341984,0.0001810428,0.00002827436,0.0000273476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001462525,0.00006363181,0.0002413696,0.000327457,0.00002143222,2.664841e-8,0.001148942,0.05375113,0.04918623,0.8923363,0.00001668962,0.002892162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490079,0.0000589722,0.0004235219,0.00001323815,0.00001825717,3.225752e-7,0.0001930881,0.613724,0.03832609,0.3470391,0.000001209537,0.0000532035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2954594,0.000124246,0.703736,0.00002260745,0.0001557939,0.0003440697,0.00001991135,0.0000247551,0.0001132502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838818,0.000007913605,0.01599317,0.00001692103,0.00001014998,0.00002294839,0.000006425726,0.00001107951,0.00004953363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2438464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01398804653076193,"score_gpt":0.2343991185882977,"score_spread":0.2204110720575357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}