{"id":"W2031297502","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.12550","title":"Driving Under the Influence of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist <scp>XLR</scp>‐11","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Synthetic cannabinoids; Cannabinoid; Agonist; Cannabinoid receptor; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Rimonabant; Inverse agonist; Pharmacology; Driving under the influence; Chemistry; Medicine; Poison control; Receptor; Internal medicine; Emergency medicine; Injury prevention","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004850716,0.0002132221,0.000486627,0.0002687119,0.0007330376,0.00004445463,0.0009523181,0.0002325787,0.0001732164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001778534,0.0001316075,0.0002808674,0.0007905742,0.003954242,0.0002803944,0.0001035399,0.0007144543,0.00003095423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005521669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003405563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004686941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001931009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.0007373581,0.0007928718,0.0002502069,0.0005150738,0.0005002843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956723,0.002385818,0.001076199,0.0002373294,0.0004110851,0.0002172559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001641025,0.000825465,0.2671694,0.0001313225,0.001244359,0.00004826268,0.006664874,0.3479902,0.1377489,0.08037093,0.1311237,0.02651842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004061675,0.003665898,0.2193567,0.0004999141,0.002896172,0.00139069,0.01653618,0.0184973,0.4040114,0.05037802,0.2779206,0.0007854089],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909455,0.0003869384,0.0002363579,0.004339298,0.001438006,0.00009395398,0.00000485422,0.00001490915,0.002540163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964973,0.0001110056,0.0006503008,0.001798803,0.0002860794,0.000003157441,5.466686e-7,0.000009440287,0.0006433068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.329493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04104996405489985,"score_gpt":0.362664451621319,"score_spread":0.3216144875664191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}