{"id":"W2031297502","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.12550","title":"Driving Under the Influence of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist <scp>XLR</scp>‐11","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Synthetic cannabinoids; Cannabinoid; Agonist; Cannabinoid receptor; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Rimonabant; Inverse agonist; Pharmacology; Driving under the influence; Chemistry; Medicine; Poison control; Receptor; Internal medicine; Emergency medicine; Injury prevention","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001390674,0.0005663292,0.0003688891,0.0006499593,0.001078642,0.0005663481,0.0004625258,0.001513566,0.00170142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006360057,0.0002525614,0.0004431625,0.00022712,0.0004973249,0.0003478873,0.000521689,0.001124341,0.0006680593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004606757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004557664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003029838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00399334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997343,0.00002778657,0.00002431403,0.00005770103,0.00009065396,0.00006521047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.00007556709,0.0001373467,0.000023876,0.00004278406,0.00007848208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002213541,0.0001163942,0.01935937,0.0000726397,0.00003553131,0.9564552,0.0004270144,0.0001167275,0.01504094,0.0002577422,0.0008195338,0.007077761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129642,0.0005859119,0.01635553,0.00002741222,0.0000560597,0.9612247,0.0004815521,0.0007490412,0.01346537,0.0002124709,0.006805132,0.00002393421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847612,0.002673809,0.001912784,0.001733755,0.0002012959,0.00007327474,0.0001997443,0.00008349377,0.008360559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948986,0.001068574,0.0004143025,0.0005275792,0.0001134225,0.000007908994,0.00007369255,0.000008706808,0.002887269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003029838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006024361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04104996405489985,"score_gpt":0.362664451621319,"score_spread":0.3216144875664191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}