{"id":"W2031352293","doi":"10.1243/095765003321148709","title":"Survey of thermodynamic methods to improve the efficiency of coal-fired electricity generation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy","topic":"Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals","keywords":"Electricity generation; Process engineering; Exergy; Electricity; Coal; Exergy efficiency; Computer science; Efficient energy use; Coal fired; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Waste management; Power (physics); Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001518332,0.000143431,0.0004495627,0.0001198529,0.00004084376,0.000007293319,0.0002897742,0.00009541485,0.000006089465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003983949,0.00008867301,0.0001805857,0.0003770385,0.0000812078,0.00007947561,0.00002587795,0.0001378135,6.354417e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003326347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005698472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007993404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005837437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986445,0.00004488712,0.000776991,0.00009521656,0.0002864696,0.0001519704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989352,0.00008119748,0.0003753331,0.0001022,0.0004382128,0.00006792325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053069,0.0001087258,0.00006301458,0.000135288,0.0003118339,1.827972e-7,0.000429743,0.07850584,0.8539828,0.06437437,0.0001601767,0.001822706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007456876,0.0005771166,0.0005567932,0.0002380927,0.0002174058,0.00002962237,0.000300516,0.2677268,0.7279373,0.0009055357,0.0005292182,0.0002358871],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5658072,0.001179747,0.431354,0.00002610558,0.0008151221,0.00007385349,0.00001003597,0.000008508209,0.0007255042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988983,0.0001589883,0.0008677707,0.000009334871,0.00002699107,0.000002250667,5.11292e-7,0.00001121304,0.00002467063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4330911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3615981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01099368744224116,"score_gpt":0.2372783173413643,"score_spread":0.2262846298991231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}