{"id":"W2031527118","doi":"10.1139/x01-105","title":"Using landscape metrics to measure suitability of a forested watershed: a case study for old growth","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Centroid; Estimator; Scale (ratio); Kernel density estimation; Computer science; Multidimensional scaling; Multivariate statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Statistics; Mathematics; Data mining; Geography; Cartography; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002193507,0.0003976109,0.0002954699,0.002295621,0.0009264682,0.0008128594,0.0005023655,0.0005349664,0.0004197433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00549922,0.0001280181,0.0003053102,0.002982018,0.0009691963,0.001118772,0.0006045042,0.0003318872,0.00004395728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001833657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006631934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03574772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1357836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990811,0.0004412391,0.00006165781,0.00008501551,0.000250383,0.00008054389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972051,0.001722786,0.000354977,0.0001513089,0.0004087935,0.0001570227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001971934,0.0004742406,0.8303953,0.0002033356,0.0001295339,0.00593657,0.00589099,0.03654683,0.004815244,0.004539971,0.001449768,0.1094211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004330645,0.0008083973,0.8573118,0.00007492238,0.0001009881,0.005422696,0.01536191,0.1054595,0.006535445,0.004570801,0.004199874,0.0001102594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993908,0.0000861903,0.00500961,0.000105417,0.000001530154,0.00005974339,0.0001080106,0.00001134751,0.0007100934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848917,0.00007736099,0.01463255,0.000007953877,0.000002149275,0.00002865749,0.0001297354,0.000005976509,0.0002238576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03574772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07107925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1176524283329697,"score_gpt":0.3547212800159925,"score_spread":0.2370688516830228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}