{"id":"W2031614891","doi":"10.1080/1943815x.2011.599812","title":"Evaluating climate justice – attitudes and opinions of individual stakeholders in the United Nations Framework Climate Change Convention Conference of the Parties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Climate justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Conference of the parties; Distributive justice; Climate change; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Law; Ecology; Geography; Kyoto Protocol","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01355098,0.00022629,0.0003634399,0.0009498006,0.0040459,0.004335973,0.0004015178,0.001378156,0.001572383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02883039,0.0001564617,0.0005248422,0.0009680405,0.002373972,0.001938866,0.002110594,0.001832391,0.0003030719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002196027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00138997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01085269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871184,0.008950579,0.0005117613,0.0004717193,0.001641312,0.001306281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835507,0.007991422,0.002895955,0.0004418544,0.003412246,0.001707911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006425196,0.0004724904,0.4623764,0.0001386972,0.0002020709,0.0008712012,0.4650381,0.001642991,0.003568761,0.00492071,0.004411876,0.05571406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001627137,0.0003611768,0.2597653,0.000143053,0.0000398623,0.0001755206,0.7216191,0.001724932,0.00129754,0.002118209,0.01260735,0.0001316385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928544,0.00007768915,0.000185209,0.001145777,0.00002439376,0.00002201705,0.00002545456,0.000001535976,0.005663556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988951,0.00007484467,0.00008717029,0.0002677138,0.00001170418,0.00001693896,0.00002435491,0.000001725289,0.0006203377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01355098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07166529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.554590442325517,"score_gpt":0.3708816231744859,"score_spread":0.1837088191510312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}