{"id":"W2031883633","doi":"10.1088/0953-8984/23/20/205603","title":"Analyzing the success of<i>T</i>-matrix diagrammatic theories in representing a modified Hubbard model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Condensed Matter","topic":"Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hubbard model; Limit (mathematics); Physics; Diagrammatic reasoning; Renormalization; Matrix (chemical analysis); Quantum mechanics; Density matrix renormalization group; Statistical physics; Self-energy; Hartree; Mathematical physics; Renormalization group; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001630841,0.0004934535,0.000357796,0.002025859,0.0007240726,0.001372691,0.001588309,0.0007369319,0.0010688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005375257,0.0001988728,0.0005849127,0.001289086,0.001310696,0.001810512,0.0005065358,0.0006538941,0.0002607337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007049466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005667487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002278058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002312407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995338,0.0002541647,0.00001751053,0.00002465521,0.0001265906,0.00004336948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981301,0.0009196678,0.0002207751,0.0003842606,0.0002843229,0.00006083771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001639942,0.0002113068,0.004270434,0.000307092,0.00008395966,0.0003766333,0.0005716258,0.2197471,0.01343493,0.7374929,0.000774725,0.02256526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002754,0.00008625737,0.0005710812,0.00003466481,0.00002750709,0.00007186957,0.00009000452,0.8838322,0.0069974,0.1072755,0.0009569526,0.00002902309],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8045965,0.0009586357,0.1714153,0.0005030016,0.00007546922,0.0001118926,0.00008223856,0.0005510218,0.02170598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566569,0.0004841006,0.04132635,0.0000342565,0.00003297376,0.00004728032,0.00004958655,0.000106311,0.001262168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002278058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008624852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02761915717368162,"score_gpt":0.2618245516096675,"score_spread":0.2342053944359859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}