{"id":"W2031902913","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.09.006","title":"Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Latency (audio); Absolute (philosophy); Identification (biology); Clinical judgment; Eyewitness identification; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087849,0.0004329617,0.0006494549,0.001373833,0.0007940888,0.002641295,0.0007667603,0.003970644,0.02022114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2340563,0.000715836,0.0003668851,0.0005700469,0.001904221,0.00702162,0.001357259,0.002248505,0.002680429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003212926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005161618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008405485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008088047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948173,0.001708522,0.0006392013,0.0009250281,0.001288216,0.000621721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8341842,0.0929044,0.04425933,0.01529017,0.008804885,0.004557023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00400719,0.00101518,0.83617,0.000506258,0.0005724274,0.004757891,0.00666227,0.0009645647,0.01208884,0.0104701,0.01049035,0.112295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003442856,0.001071713,0.8717059,0.0005430659,0.000562666,0.01636261,0.01110572,0.005394035,0.01481096,0.06205915,0.01583493,0.000204847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700477,0.001317188,0.003374981,0.009987272,0.0007105373,0.00005070192,0.0004034619,0.00003894138,0.01406921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951698,0.0006454941,0.0009583696,0.001181697,0.0004054946,0.00001395035,0.0001771814,0.00003088053,0.001417043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02022114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06764644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07092653190786924,"score_gpt":0.3384818196050298,"score_spread":0.2675552876971606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}