{"id":"W2031933270","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.1054","title":"PIH22 Quality of Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses 1997-2009","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Prospective cohort study; MEDLINE; Health care; Population; Economic evaluation; Regression analysis; Cost–utility analysis; Confidence interval; Sample size determination; Family medicine; Pediatrics; Demography; Environmental health; Statistics; Cost effectiveness; Surgery; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005149434,0.0004079899,0.000769293,0.003481925,0.0002792245,0.001492339,0.001102631,0.0004663783,0.007509387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03040037,0.0004281854,0.002044043,0.01217539,0.0003406564,0.001059198,0.0009563436,0.00129235,0.0009051249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006406986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004175543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.158205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1243338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954332,0.001267305,0.0004236531,0.0005084065,0.001880872,0.0004866074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976705,0.008961098,0.006114057,0.001718417,0.005719727,0.0007815789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009852909,0.00008214967,0.8371444,0.0006082092,0.002491797,0.0001741042,0.0001651504,0.02342326,0.0001161621,0.003913851,0.08471428,0.04618131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585231,0.00006920808,0.9795563,0.0001196917,0.0003796786,0.0001786489,0.0001028824,0.004022716,0.0002859393,0.0004101055,0.01479945,0.00001682051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4158543,0.006085197,0.002980742,0.002542699,0.0001522349,0.0001504974,0.5545622,0.0002053598,0.01746677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7907428,0.001992262,0.001624989,0.0003877019,0.0001334552,0.0001430342,0.2001761,0.0001564482,0.004643168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3145683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4401127181774099,"score_gpt":0.4370819508789966,"score_spread":0.003030767298413339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}