{"id":"W2032045378","doi":"10.1038/bjc.2013.34","title":"Innovative estimation of survival using log-normal survival modelling on ACCENT database","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Cancer","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Queen's University","keywords":"Proportional hazards model; Survival analysis; Medicine; Internal medicine; Relative survival; Hazard ratio; Colorectal cancer; Cancer; Surgery; Oncology; Cancer registry; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007685632,0.0001062004,0.0003841854,0.0000784989,0.00005494714,0.00006118791,0.0001535062,0.00004950414,0.0005656524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009547871,0.0001056,0.00005378787,0.0002199069,0.00006912258,0.0003127689,0.0000392244,0.000291459,0.000001804579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007984596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001568516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001046843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000336641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983709,0.0001596855,0.0007020436,0.0001072509,0.0004736115,0.0001865342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975564,0.0006293234,0.0006168302,0.0001014882,0.001014742,0.00008119305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002502254,0.0005319679,0.001719487,0.0004669513,0.0002812893,0.0001111416,0.0003569727,0.1086298,0.002898558,0.09248843,0.001101398,0.7911638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002130944,0.0003785999,0.006806849,0.004103278,0.0001658751,0.0002100931,0.0003484123,0.813078,0.009636492,0.1624715,0.0001514215,0.0005185155],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3721435,0.000147656,0.626722,0.00002352453,0.0003493349,0.00008266036,0.00006887,0.000003727786,0.0004587242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5789087,0.0001763338,0.4206653,0.00003576663,0.0001706508,0.000003329468,0.000002081124,0.00001689825,0.00002089308],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7906453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6193497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1779892630632349,"score_gpt":0.416067982778762,"score_spread":0.2380787197155271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}