{"id":"W2032079371","doi":"10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.020","title":"Evaluating the Type II error rate in a sediment toxicity classification using the Reference Condition Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Toxicology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; Eusko Jaurlaritza; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Ellipse; Tubifex tubifex; Statistics; Sediment; Type I and type II errors; Metric (unit); Boundary (topology); Environmental science; Mathematics; Ecology; Biology; Geology; Engineering; Geometry; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1044799,0.001585855,0.002040278,0.002493758,0.001118747,0.002068073,0.002692659,0.004939345,0.001285669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2790256,0.0004715068,0.002436314,0.001497624,0.001912078,0.0025478,0.001819968,0.002666295,0.000556499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001558641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003045683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001960852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9303147,0.04074553,0.006898396,0.01097871,0.01009529,0.0009672864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4309878,0.5130754,0.01167521,0.02150738,0.02147443,0.001279868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01563901,0.001285014,0.3149079,0.001072,0.007665539,0.001426784,0.001094849,0.2009189,0.01462913,0.007853836,0.004412832,0.4290941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006763338,0.004510546,0.07664312,0.0001969573,0.002320881,0.001818635,0.0004813025,0.8802608,0.02200719,0.008927615,0.001872734,0.0002839157],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3513021,0.001486551,0.6420397,0.0005026376,0.0005031992,0.0006405244,0.0006214182,0.001127132,0.001776745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8315651,0.0002605541,0.1645691,0.000316142,0.0001626815,0.0004133934,0.001183598,0.0002726661,0.001256846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1044799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5525489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1173221451306335,"score_gpt":0.3621120039191643,"score_spread":0.2447898587885308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}