{"id":"W2032126517","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00516.x","title":"The Influence of Identification Decision and DNA Evidence on Juror Decision Making<sup>1</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Witness; Reliability (semiconductor); Identification (biology); Eyewitness identification; Social psychology; Dna testing; Perception; Computer science; Law; Genetics; Data mining; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01992528,0.0003659738,0.0003735391,0.0007511818,0.0007881622,0.002150294,0.0003427565,0.000809708,0.003683213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2288457,0.0003004805,0.000449753,0.0002922971,0.0009444877,0.0009290742,0.0009945186,0.0009487099,0.0005399112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006091401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009412815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008978577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783862,0.01505193,0.001681286,0.0008121853,0.003576998,0.0004913859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6489506,0.3069187,0.02897641,0.004165795,0.008292268,0.00269619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02794071,0.002306229,0.4534645,0.001438947,0.001103676,0.002492586,0.01856613,0.00824072,0.1198189,0.005905108,0.002480544,0.356242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008159051,0.01068215,0.869845,0.0008736104,0.000940496,0.002668674,0.01568677,0.02155939,0.05814148,0.009832013,0.008475479,0.0004789981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925191,0.0003845831,0.002634261,0.0003328889,0.00004165783,0.00006820227,0.00002445432,0.00001566516,0.003979114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950148,0.000184379,0.004117052,0.0001010803,0.000034977,0.00004498779,0.00003182855,0.000009081454,0.0004618054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01992528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1053762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04487340792176357,"score_gpt":0.4337711459297325,"score_spread":0.3888977380079689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}