{"id":"W2032281464","doi":"10.5558/tfc85235-2","title":"Forest management and stick-nesting birds: New direction for mitigation in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Occupancy; Disturbance (geology); Nest (protein structural motif); Nesting (process); Forest management; Geography; Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Productivity; Christian ministry; Ecology; Environmental science; Forestry; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001185656,0.00007042842,0.00005278692,0.00001963524,0.0001375956,0.00003929092,0.00007515152,0.00002636573,0.0001001307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001293346,0.00005704031,0.00002054942,0.0001034169,0.00003180641,0.0002493732,0.00002828495,0.0000750629,0.00002021633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003546776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001755847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02685426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1479444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994678,0.00001147025,0.000131759,0.0001516289,0.00008634962,0.0001510305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997587,0.00003370137,0.00004872149,0.0001227128,0.000003359156,0.00003277652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009864329,0.0001166435,0.8373308,0.00001305124,0.00001327833,0.000002840839,0.001261924,0.02960577,0.001422186,0.001335675,0.01317226,0.115627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003583431,0.00008648346,0.9694394,0.00002879126,0.00001145324,0.000006142535,0.0000878615,0.01492927,0.0001535354,0.005527699,0.009297271,0.00007376548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947851,0.00002975011,0.001046212,0.001290197,0.00007036755,0.0003295726,4.88952e-7,0.00002690371,0.002421401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959525,0.000007394494,0.001374207,0.0002561529,0.00004066594,0.00001965259,0.000006146044,0.000005315097,0.002337942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1321086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01339204365913956,"score_gpt":0.2279211574811656,"score_spread":0.2145291138220261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}