{"id":"W2032412866","doi":"10.5558/tfc81359-3","title":"Re-evaluating our approach to forest management planning: A complex journey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Computer science; Forest management; Sustainable management; Decision support system; Environmental resource management; Key (lock); Process management; Management science; Knowledge management; Business; Sustainability; Ecology; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Forestry; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02440572,0.00124605,0.001701953,0.003263797,0.003390379,0.01831718,0.005457962,0.003936447,0.005119543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03790206,0.000593006,0.0009654739,0.002818494,0.01451477,0.01668234,0.007471063,0.007477951,0.0009561254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01142293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01068259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01189435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01396316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.978411,0.01492682,0.0008468953,0.001240247,0.003741194,0.0008338315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725078,0.01671035,0.001106635,0.003350317,0.004739999,0.00158492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000703267,0.000144663,0.002562465,0.0007471325,0.0002041402,0.0003093915,0.00593593,0.07123256,0.001118476,0.7029909,0.01521212,0.199472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001994216,0.00008623245,0.0007432223,0.0005975266,0.00004166164,0.0001315979,0.008771776,0.0372443,0.0004800563,0.8508115,0.100985,0.00008725832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05836979,0.01922563,0.5599903,0.2622926,0.002082942,0.0004319685,0.0002820071,0.0004605882,0.09686428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5287379,0.01435568,0.4434333,0.004969365,0.0008133115,0.0004026945,0.0002192824,0.0002701872,0.006798283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02440572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1290713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08112550638185798,"score_gpt":0.3311857523999153,"score_spread":0.2500602460180573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}