{"id":"W2032456170","doi":"10.3758/bf03212130","title":"Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perception & Psychophysics","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Repetition priming; Response priming; Negative priming; Inhibition of return; Priming (agriculture); Repetition (rhetorical device); Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Selective attention; Communication; Perception; Cognition; Visual attention; Biology; Lexical decision task; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002221125,0.0004476081,0.0005634194,0.0004110573,0.0002904617,0.0009929697,0.001012909,0.001101702,0.005677823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01952399,0.0006696316,0.0002882407,0.000274207,0.001730197,0.001148234,0.000927233,0.001600997,0.0004683191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003455738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004453443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001129546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008284473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992854,0.0002323064,0.00003600938,0.0001758085,0.0001847948,0.0000857151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733787,0.02248111,0.002001597,0.001075694,0.0003213484,0.0007416038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0449861,0.001869571,0.03046519,0.0007960231,0.0002057027,0.001093784,0.00333585,0.001438776,0.8283827,0.02075427,0.001572478,0.06509953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002484264,0.004258616,0.7946918,0.000208693,0.0008519977,0.003370892,0.0008959399,0.01201137,0.09187296,0.08508424,0.004077379,0.0001918484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834437,0.0006623741,0.002897108,0.0006753957,0.0001150666,0.00006380023,0.0001060136,0.00005260526,0.01198391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966318,0.000329079,0.001162336,0.0003192133,0.0001401622,0.00004691118,0.00008669271,0.0001450929,0.0011387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005677823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01899421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06325889597012173,"score_gpt":0.3170572535509337,"score_spread":0.253798357580812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}