{"id":"W2032502926","doi":"10.1139/f10-152","title":"Evaluating otolith Sr/Ca as a tool for reconstructing estuarine habitat use","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory","keywords":"Estuary; Otolith; Salinity; Strontium; Oceanography; Environmental science; Bass (fish); Geology; Fishery; Chemistry; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008230779,0.0006204105,0.0003982924,0.001980989,0.0003325773,0.000774847,0.0005584696,0.0003418325,0.000697917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00160993,0.0002829892,0.0003118826,0.001270438,0.0003328837,0.0006929325,0.0004758969,0.0002716804,0.0002099407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004220601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005390812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03718267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1324985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997296,0.00004742918,0.00002407327,0.00010668,0.00007001695,0.00002211292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991266,0.0002085578,0.0002631466,0.0000824341,0.0002451744,0.00007420431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001413927,0.00003986104,0.8953421,0.00009575142,0.0002258708,0.00008389618,0.0002153778,0.006721889,0.04885124,0.0001538895,0.000264674,0.04786404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000917503,0.0001508604,0.948092,0.00002389218,0.0000905372,0.00008599261,0.0002828426,0.04137472,0.00883175,0.0001525692,0.0008728123,0.00003274431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974735,0.0004321403,0.02176684,0.00003602201,0.000008279598,0.00002174659,0.0009037604,0.0002542255,0.00184211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752768,0.0002147081,0.02342012,0.00001691767,0.000005537751,0.00001432288,0.0004857942,0.00004281147,0.0005229862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03718267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07393247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09511665549145053,"score_gpt":0.2941886677144675,"score_spread":0.199072012223017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}