{"id":"W2032618095","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.02.011","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of different smoking policies in restaurants and bars in Beijing, China: A four-year follow-up study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health","topic":"Smoking Behavior and Cessation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of California, Davis; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Beijing; Secondhand smoke; Tobacco control; Environmental health; Mainland China; China; Smoke; Medicine; Smoking ban; Passive smoking; Business; Advertising; Geography; Public health; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002586952,0.0009463297,0.001216902,0.001230087,0.001918981,0.0009244032,0.001071229,0.001677505,0.0007626427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003596711,0.0008414207,0.001521518,0.001332691,0.001113809,0.001195582,0.001037586,0.001289368,0.0003055461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003091927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002046728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08862217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08669817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988424,0.0003080391,0.0001266763,0.0001925844,0.0002232361,0.0003070445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969305,0.0003524015,0.0008020632,0.0002999939,0.0007546023,0.0008604152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001574253,0.00232747,0.9892777,0.00002238446,0.0002387443,0.0001959668,0.002028104,0.00009895087,0.0006730757,0.00001318022,0.00006037271,0.003489852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004835062,0.001286508,0.9972338,0.000003135947,0.0001099496,0.00001924447,0.0009451014,0.0001244548,0.0001301041,0.000009701215,0.00007749017,0.00001216543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998162,0.00004241181,0.000009201609,0.00001302151,0.000002500757,0.00001688587,0.00003494868,9.616309e-7,0.00006389645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993588,0.00004363123,0.00002924436,0.00002515709,0.000003540018,0.00002812735,0.0001581318,0.000001173721,0.000352192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08862217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1762126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04838074800533892,"score_gpt":0.3667911807960251,"score_spread":0.3184104327906861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}