{"id":"W2032642726","doi":"10.1007/s00442-005-0306-y","title":"Variation in predation pressure as a mechanism underlying differences in numerical abundance between populations of the poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Florida State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Predation; Lepomis; Killifish; Poeciliidae; Population density; Ecology; Population; Predator; Abundance (ecology); Density dependence; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002877835,0.0001653679,0.0001983407,0.0005929247,0.0003322959,0.0004954301,0.0004015501,0.0003823808,0.0008832882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001095445,0.0002614512,0.0001904756,0.0002610628,0.0008574111,0.0003919951,0.0005643196,0.0003804584,0.00008659439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003467825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002367436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003719923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007116201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998083,0.00004974868,0.00001458472,0.0000614265,0.00003709182,0.00002903744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994056,0.0001379383,0.0002433081,0.0000760003,0.00005051128,0.00008668407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006788422,0.0002341137,0.7572597,0.00005607631,0.0002455612,0.0002638887,0.001215374,0.001143851,0.2234936,0.0009299217,0.0002138204,0.01426521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006721064,0.00005894516,0.9978024,0.000001473299,0.00001236054,0.0001066411,0.0001288919,0.00102072,0.0005952598,0.0002212033,0.00003920619,0.000005984844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996023,0.00001096713,0.0001613177,0.00001259475,9.648006e-7,0.000002326728,0.00001917726,0.000003767881,0.0001865886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997496,0.000007140796,0.0001461235,0.000008088311,0.000001108277,0.000003890849,0.00002657316,0.000001717012,0.00005582494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003719923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007396519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04512770135840067,"score_gpt":0.284422711248015,"score_spread":0.2392950098896143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}