{"id":"W2032642726","doi":"10.1007/s00442-005-0306-y","title":"Variation in predation pressure as a mechanism underlying differences in numerical abundance between populations of the poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Florida State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Predation; Lepomis; Killifish; Poeciliidae; Population density; Ecology; Population; Predator; Abundance (ecology); Density dependence; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002592144,0.00009923799,0.0001832787,0.00003788559,0.00008998267,0.00001143979,0.0002398068,0.0001900631,0.0006997933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001075337,0.00007486204,0.00003539062,0.0002135261,0.00008788594,0.0001984736,0.0001074123,0.0001680147,0.00002733592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001502486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001516927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004374688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008040168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989392,0.0001629,0.0003190363,0.0002430408,0.0001212515,0.0002145824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995594,0.0001042223,0.0001544643,0.0001518943,0.00000614172,0.00002387892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009598079,0.0001101438,0.9920757,0.000003073596,0.000003247342,3.357692e-7,0.0002592868,0.0004189892,0.005222403,0.0002147828,0.00003801703,0.001644442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003384952,0.0001070627,0.9947695,0.000007247386,0.00001609424,0.000001171413,0.00003213729,0.001685504,0.0002659406,0.002628042,0.00006329085,0.000085547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976948,0.000004779115,0.0003990707,0.0008992171,0.0001419975,0.0004161504,0.00001727956,0.00001521607,0.0004114287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987363,0.000003312492,0.0008555338,0.0001487426,0.00001738441,0.00006002499,0.00001162354,0.000004441972,0.0001626788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7662246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04512770135840067,"score_gpt":0.284422711248015,"score_spread":0.2392950098896143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}