{"id":"W2032729100","doi":"10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.02.012","title":"Lipschitz continuity of solutions of a free boundary problem involving the p-Laplacian","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications","topic":"Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Lipschitz continuity; Boundary (topology); Lipschitz domain; Laplace operator; Mathematical analysis; p-Laplacian; Free boundary problem; Boundary value problem; Pure mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009609647,0.0001108088,0.0005895538,0.0002119254,0.0001721823,0.00003707601,0.0003375431,0.00005738751,0.00007314045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004972316,0.00007005788,0.0003948177,0.0007762594,0.0002072894,0.00008923781,0.00006417176,0.0001885486,0.000001721257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001511858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006628127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005391481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005351972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981407,0.00009387717,0.001150898,0.0001001337,0.0003736005,0.0001408198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.0007100216,0.001016311,0.0004193739,0.0004073274,0.00008994262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212515,0.001019071,0.0002056074,0.000110091,0.0007368386,3.261223e-7,0.0006573932,0.00002626591,0.006188572,0.9871454,0.000264552,0.003633781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002637719,0.00008877366,0.002549441,0.00007535671,0.002470317,0.000009855897,0.0002933104,0.002565631,0.0009414029,0.9904349,0.0002275631,0.00007962339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1250462,0.0003826577,0.8694393,0.002966102,0.000008979192,0.0004290899,0.00005639627,0.00001318666,0.001658097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466351,0.00004139396,0.05312265,0.00002642248,0.00008035774,0.00001331701,0.000002814123,0.000006729721,0.00007126279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2856878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03459900498100291,"score_gpt":0.3086741894102532,"score_spread":0.2740751844292502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}