{"id":"W2032838523","doi":"10.1016/s0378-4274(03)00257-1","title":"Probabilistic hazard assessment of environmentally occurring pharmaceuticals toxicity to fish, daphnids and algae by ECOSAR screening","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toxicology Letters","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":495,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Office of Research and Development; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Prioritization; Risk assessment; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Environmental risk assessment; Hazard analysis; Hazard; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chemical toxicity; Probabilistic logic; Toxicology; Ecology; Biology; Chemistry; Water pollutants; Statistics; Fishery; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004863956,0.0002906421,0.0003467991,0.00004295858,0.0001471228,0.00002317492,0.0002434267,0.000100297,0.002516476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007289524,0.0002780495,0.00006863409,0.0001422014,0.000752565,0.0001923286,0.0003376882,0.0002759779,0.00007586859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000226406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006524982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000122264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009219521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977915,0.0002280001,0.0003972521,0.0005854444,0.0003483141,0.0006494386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989945,0.0001581854,0.0001046619,0.000239302,0.000001492739,0.0005018503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001784001,0.0003316108,0.1158617,0.00001995228,0.00003472625,0.00001671419,0.00006119141,0.00147615,0.8766246,0.00007286422,0.003815395,0.001667326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002283887,0.0006714653,0.357419,0.00005865891,0.000175918,0.00009216244,0.00009354319,0.00308714,0.5968711,0.0001418976,0.03808457,0.001020642],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901724,0.0000246605,0.003518208,0.002845337,0.0000871335,0.0005404162,0.00004986246,0.00003104238,0.002730892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696237,0.00002401202,0.006781075,0.0234455,0.00001322583,0.00001593269,0.000006857513,0.00002331727,0.00006630514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2797535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02386467147703489,"score_gpt":0.3092100416617724,"score_spread":0.2853453701847375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}