{"id":"W2032928345","doi":"10.1063/1.1467900","title":"Exchange-only optimized effective potential for molecules from resolution-of-the-identity techniques: Comparison with the local density approximation, with and without asymptotic correction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences; Université de Montréal; Compute Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Atomic orbital; Atomic physics; Physics; Density functional theory; Ionization; Molecular orbital; Basis set; Ionization energy; Local-density approximation; Chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Molecule; Electron; Ion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001251504,0.0001756969,0.0003546484,0.000009559734,0.0001878725,0.00002182329,0.0002286219,0.00003135969,0.000002309502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001517167,0.00008484292,0.0001107966,0.0001495887,0.0005558073,0.0001971694,0.00008839964,0.0003521533,3.053282e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005050694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001799761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003529581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001866139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990963,0.00007704784,0.000246836,0.0001236974,0.0003032844,0.0001528795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984985,0.000307284,0.0006064734,0.0001935602,0.0003556034,0.00003855275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01547195,0.004347936,0.03045448,0.0004723919,0.007089074,0.000001778318,0.01409366,0.114588,0.6807117,0.007194912,0.01064552,0.1149287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00249885,0.0003270443,0.0007073471,0.0002646003,0.001083822,0.00001324794,0.0008160973,0.03937084,0.8915303,0.06307769,0.00002666786,0.000283529],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.404027,0.00006589774,0.5953508,0.0001297313,0.00003390288,0.0003058626,0.000007433985,0.000006634672,0.00007266719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943991,0.000004370781,0.005177517,0.00002583269,0.0003413074,0.00001846932,0.000003862376,0.0000185174,0.00001108191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.590372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3459794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007234552060357995,"score_gpt":0.2335350812355739,"score_spread":0.2263005291752159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}