{"id":"W2032928713","doi":"10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.05.010","title":"Structural features of DNA interaction with caffeine and theophylline","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Molecular Structure","topic":"Metal complexes synthesis and properties","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Tehran","keywords":"Theophylline; Chemistry; Caffeine; DNA; Xanthine; Binding constant; Aqueous solution; Ligand (biochemistry); Stereochemistry; Binding site; Biochemistry; Pharmacology; Organic chemistry; Receptor; Enzyme; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001679664,0.0001190238,0.0003384891,0.0001278772,0.00002493282,0.00001207878,0.00005896709,0.00005848035,0.00006006592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007371735,0.00006271208,0.00007969544,0.00008594321,0.00006916247,0.00006510677,0.00001563052,0.0002602049,7.927694e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001467392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002944028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000916314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001132502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991803,0.00003310095,0.0003007631,0.00007995481,0.0003014257,0.0001044206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992192,0.00003493169,0.0003165225,0.0001153388,0.0002295008,0.00008455286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001852962,0.000009520074,0.001295899,0.00009455939,0.0001813676,0.0001314206,0.0002208204,0.00002242969,0.9831201,0.0002811543,0.00003450778,0.0127553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009676955,0.001237189,0.1188119,0.000213587,0.000215577,0.0052629,0.0002526235,0.00001377093,0.871926,0.0005483878,0.0004606835,0.00008971935],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965202,0.002323591,0.0003593682,0.0002700322,0.0001052693,0.00007547768,0.000003256889,0.000003045462,0.0003397368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944082,0.00002192738,0.005228025,0.000143397,0.0001386616,7.336062e-8,0.000001981477,0.00001302581,0.00004471003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.117516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2557325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0112378135025003,"score_gpt":0.2582025138772777,"score_spread":0.2469647003747774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}