{"id":"W2032928823","doi":"10.1115/ipc2008-64253","title":"Pipeline Integrity Management: An Approach to Geotechnical Risks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Integrity management; Engineering; Pipeline (software); Identification (biology); Plan (archaeology); Risk management; Civil engineering; Geotechnical investigation; Risk analysis (engineering); Structural integrity; Construction engineering; Forensic engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Structural engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007004532,0.001892174,0.0008915106,0.004610364,0.003097256,0.01219909,0.005539242,0.004891926,0.005826132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006618853,0.0009817451,0.001459402,0.003748334,0.005334224,0.01065247,0.007733577,0.004551739,0.001912737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005813943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01062077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006851668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006207243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99336,0.001918018,0.0004974132,0.0009837113,0.002738561,0.0005024641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944522,0.001333646,0.0008905165,0.0007272032,0.002084594,0.0005119069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003276353,0.0001626883,0.001575794,0.0008080291,0.00007952397,0.0006117265,0.004078823,0.03111755,0.002760534,0.7503482,0.01810811,0.1903162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002470896,0.0001546379,0.001383214,0.001264165,0.0001292833,0.00101717,0.004510796,0.09280586,0.004045549,0.4478976,0.4466525,0.0001144352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003482979,0.002554308,0.9362907,0.008044187,0.0002812004,0.0004049111,0.0001596662,0.0008184369,0.04796343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1479098,0.007447227,0.8039192,0.001528338,0.0006273788,0.000618942,0.0006008714,0.0004406891,0.03690751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04218328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05474461763476465,"score_gpt":0.2754923684561001,"score_spread":0.2207477508213354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}