{"id":"W2033007322","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.02.016","title":"An investigation of the construct validity of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale through the use of a verbalization task","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alexithymia; Construct validity; Construct (python library); Psychology; Toronto Alexithymia Scale; Scale (ratio); Task (project management); Psychometrics; Test validity; Clinical psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Cartography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001210524,0.000134918,0.0004069126,0.00006672432,0.0001408851,0.00002806994,0.0005711948,0.00008965428,0.0001217859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003540548,0.00006010547,0.0002482191,0.0005623206,0.0007379048,0.000451852,0.00005006401,0.0002655722,0.00000170173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001239484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002813597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002908615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001925952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961428,0.0009065308,0.001038903,0.0001305261,0.001570476,0.0002107527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967551,0.0005031354,0.001031604,0.000900333,0.0007174596,0.00009237014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006307512,0.001870371,0.9052631,0.000901441,0.0006572579,0.00000195698,0.02605852,0.0002792443,0.04083743,0.001451822,0.01686858,0.005179515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004735693,0.001399879,0.9378251,0.007499739,0.0002872203,0.0001602302,0.005386769,0.003702121,0.01996694,0.01687402,0.002025779,0.0001365557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936596,0.0004368305,0.0002506236,0.003711165,0.0002587074,0.0007468047,0.00001823477,0.000003265203,0.0009147645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996582,0.0002633315,0.002703452,0.0001563305,0.0001114914,0.000008051885,0.000002094613,0.00001701667,0.0001562239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03256195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2718841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1262542751945564,"score_gpt":0.3942868544709824,"score_spread":0.268032579276426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}