{"id":"W2033109453","doi":"10.1109/psce.2006.296349","title":"Optimal Power Flow with Complementarity Constraints","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Complementarity (molecular biology); Mixed complementarity problem; Electric power system; Power flow; Complementarity theory; Computer science; Interior point method; Operating point; Benchmark (surveying); Optimization problem; Economic dispatch; Mathematics; Power (physics); Engineering; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003545944,0.0001175008,0.00009512613,0.00002402126,0.00003435481,0.00003283041,0.00006414011,0.00003237967,0.00242623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000124338,0.0001041729,0.00002428415,0.00007908246,0.00007173351,0.000105875,0.00001284951,0.00008416182,0.000144292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007349305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008895563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005709612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008878104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994023,0.000004913208,0.0001252524,0.0001113834,0.000122888,0.0002332321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997908,0.000009479356,0.0000087233,0.0001194532,0.00002883878,0.00004273197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006560951,0.0002697707,0.01751416,0.00005660651,0.0001796189,0.00008676579,0.00008847641,0.7701071,0.008683935,0.02360176,0.1769483,0.002397893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006394742,0.0007970463,0.1911998,0.00007617626,0.0001197154,0.0002203071,0.0005975574,0.6540869,0.0428962,0.0004110813,0.1007403,0.002460153],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5530649,0.00002057363,0.3047068,0.00007078494,0.0001552456,0.0001726714,0.000183526,0.0006357371,0.1409898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649757,3.485744e-7,0.03469788,0.00002395035,0.00002644486,0.000005175015,0.0001811151,0.00001455,0.00007488055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4119108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004802236468634928,"score_gpt":0.1891944526791192,"score_spread":0.1843922162104843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}