{"id":"W2033205747","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/aef.2-3.414","title":"Bipedal Walking Trajectory Generation Using Tchebychev Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced engineering forum","topic":"Robotic Locomotion and Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Torque; Trajectory; Set (abstract data type); Control theory (sociology); Robot; Computer science; Quadratic programming; Gait; Joint (building); Biped robot; Ankle; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003144329,0.0004530887,0.0005803669,0.00043433,0.0003823704,0.0003307781,0.0008114213,0.0006463354,0.003493347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005568967,0.0002732367,0.0003518635,0.0005733928,0.0003082552,0.0003711657,0.0004721837,0.0004957228,0.0005637156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004392419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000989518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005674596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003993786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998544,0.00002719798,0.00000786585,0.0000247857,0.00006888663,0.00001682954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997754,0.00007660031,0.00002292594,0.00002201495,0.00008785604,0.00001533016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006517646,0.00005108392,0.000263621,0.0001895375,0.00002579571,0.0001018119,0.00007601835,0.8412732,0.01336996,0.0262567,0.00225729,0.1160697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000860986,0.0000147417,0.00004096975,0.000004941997,0.000001721223,0.00001396221,0.000003091299,0.9962581,0.0008922996,0.002028992,0.0007282101,0.000004367461],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005066297,0.00007042056,0.9925136,0.00003344014,0.000014768,0.00004966229,0.00002959789,0.0001297094,0.002092444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.326597,0.000267101,0.6637273,0.00007228392,0.0000219939,0.0006842053,0.0002987875,0.0001580721,0.008173293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005674596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01168638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02472503335598018,"score_gpt":0.2317014452832104,"score_spread":0.2069764119272302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}