{"id":"W2033269323","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.45.6.690","title":"Positive Consumer Contagion: Responses to Attractive Others in a Retail Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":276,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Context (archaeology); Emotional contagion; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Marketing; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Contrast (vision); Business; Realization (probability); Social influence; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01578985,0.0001286332,0.0003282589,0.0009741973,0.0003271945,0.0000166723,0.0003573503,0.0001838688,0.003801256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002953796,0.000118939,0.0001154052,0.0004306194,0.000546071,0.0001418279,0.00005721167,0.001654918,0.0003810568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002772752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002638698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001185298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008889859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919198,0.005998123,0.0005972979,0.0002874533,0.0005957524,0.0006015805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916864,0.006838611,0.0002138844,0.0002511523,0.0008145001,0.0001954571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06526348,0.0008909738,0.8024638,0.000007776243,0.0001777084,0.005219458,0.0192879,0.000001324924,0.001588225,0.0007162528,0.09664712,0.007736024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001844553,0.0007625797,0.9731872,0.0001804301,0.000009570508,0.001874901,0.007951968,5.05752e-7,0.00003408779,0.00008954405,0.0139482,0.0001164417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704055,0.001198971,0.0000121085,0.003505041,0.000380029,0.0002918394,0.00001019206,0.000008264969,0.02418807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827136,0.00007843879,0.0001313187,0.000429416,0.0001773354,0.00002081104,7.211381e-7,0.00002215151,0.01642619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1707235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1845973620171135,"score_gpt":0.4550869331162033,"score_spread":0.2704895710990898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}