{"id":"W2033318853","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0048805","title":"Re-Evaluation of a Bacterial Antifreeze Protein as an Adhesin with Ice-Binding Activity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Antifreeze protein; Bacterial adhesin; Bacteria; Gel electrophoresis; Biology; Homology (biology); Biochemistry; Peptide sequence; Chemistry; Molecular biology; Escherichia coli; Gene; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002627436,0.0002621371,0.0002398066,0.0001284772,0.0001431566,0.0002735977,0.0002712547,0.0002478619,0.0004535803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002147909,0.00007924793,0.0002657819,0.0001393419,0.000124519,0.000294175,0.0002140048,0.0004167286,0.0002005327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002301852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001427726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001086655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008948117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998348,0.00003193512,0.00001502155,0.00001935944,0.00006534327,0.00003358103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999887,0.00002356134,0.00001209041,0.00001516555,0.00004066432,0.00002163917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000269088,0.00002307058,0.0004812246,0.00001615439,0.000003209128,0.00004411497,0.0000127294,0.00002548756,0.9985687,0.00003328458,0.00001226775,0.0007527766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004348168,0.0002472889,0.007581619,0.000003654164,0.00001967597,0.0002887554,0.00005010133,0.0009787545,0.9889932,0.00002448607,0.001805699,0.00000229978],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961417,0.0007419502,0.002230201,0.00007951611,0.00001648422,0.0000174754,0.0000904449,0.00001414096,0.0006681266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942146,0.0005012374,0.0026399,0.0000631455,0.000008002198,0.00001196427,0.0005847258,0.00001705949,0.001959294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001086655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002160668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1036911193193997,"score_gpt":0.2625180369836584,"score_spread":0.1588269176642587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}