{"id":"W2033348182","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2004.12.042","title":"Non-chromatographic speciation of toxic arsenic in fish","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Talanta","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Chemistry; Arsenic; Certified reference materials; Detection limit; Chromatography; Extraction (chemistry); Genetic algorithm; Arsenobetaine; Solid phase extraction; Fluorescence spectrometry; Repeatability; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sample preparation; Environmental chemistry; Inorganic arsenic; Fluorescence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001079204,0.00004894102,0.00006905233,0.0000504383,0.00001694611,0.000003795231,0.00006920614,0.00003255608,0.001746173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008574848,0.00005041131,0.00002708907,0.0001957013,0.00004062043,0.0001412823,0.00003154926,0.00004121703,0.0002041417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006203401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004564986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008021331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00366882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994906,0.00001182503,0.0001612024,0.0001079636,0.0001360071,0.00009246228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997938,0.00001270142,0.00006413292,0.0001019517,0.000002709582,0.00002469205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001568908,0.0002400724,0.7569136,0.00001225134,0.000007226794,0.000005093927,0.002447828,0.0003956019,0.1484704,0.0004689527,0.005525287,0.08549806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000348659,0.00001795223,0.9769901,0.00001214382,0.00000316137,0.000004072463,0.00008612901,0.002338117,0.01567638,0.00008667556,0.004365873,0.00007072399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688171,0.000003437671,0.00003338533,0.0002751726,0.00003031752,0.00009741346,0.000002558225,0.00001184149,0.03072883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989275,0.00002168798,0.00008660479,0.0001400939,0.00002266933,0.000004212407,0.00001137082,0.000003942754,0.0007818694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2200765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005721656994315804,"score_gpt":0.2090100456027116,"score_spread":0.2032883886083958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}