{"id":"W2033458243","doi":"10.2514/1.c031382","title":"Discretization Method for the Development of a Modular Morphing Wing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aircraft","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Morphing; Wing; Discretization; Curvature; Chord (peer-to-peer); Modular design; Wing twist; Mathematics; Computer science; Lift (data mining); Airfoil; Geometry; Aerospace engineering; Angle of attack; Aerodynamics; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003728614,0.0003189706,0.0003204993,0.0003485994,0.0002737172,0.0003373114,0.000633959,0.0004009414,0.002730808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006474032,0.0002257487,0.0005001208,0.0002343587,0.0003412571,0.0003617543,0.0005708914,0.0007016791,0.00067509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003732307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004658343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001180428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00127453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998081,0.00004053791,0.00001234663,0.00003159346,0.00009243044,0.00001489731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998111,0.00007923439,0.00002121309,0.00003316357,0.00004603678,0.000009258964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009466371,0.0000682325,0.001637924,0.0003541826,0.00004676688,0.0002055063,0.0003578408,0.5347072,0.08661229,0.08487627,0.002725777,0.2883133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001962107,0.00004961616,0.000197417,0.00002421283,0.000008044505,0.0001068062,0.00002126541,0.9750182,0.006464678,0.005885932,0.01219219,0.00001192072],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003022682,0.00008943484,0.9948277,0.00002595405,0.00002558813,0.00002626816,0.00001609519,0.0001034344,0.001862827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1335458,0.0002558928,0.8630419,0.00003786602,0.0000208753,0.0001648946,0.00007577816,0.00008483628,0.002772171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002730808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009135485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01502368848533207,"score_gpt":0.2583238297904534,"score_spread":0.2433001413051213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}