{"id":"W203349658","doi":"10.1007/s10040-012-0931-6","title":"Influence of fracture anisotropy and lithological heterogeneity on wellfield response in a fluvial sandstone aquifer of the Carboniferous Moncton Subbasin, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrogeology Journal","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Aquifer; Fluvial; Hydrogeology; Groundwater flow; Groundwater; Lithology; Fracture (geology); MODFLOW; Drawdown (hydrology); Borehole; Bed; Aquifer test; Geomorphology; Petrology; Geochemistry; Anisotropy; Geotechnical engineering; Groundwater recharge","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004606168,0.0001004968,0.0001919428,0.00002799371,0.00009999385,0.000003372803,0.0001465974,0.0000856331,0.00007129722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001249001,0.00006241213,0.0000344176,0.00008855099,0.0003258665,0.00007687222,0.0001312957,0.0002670119,0.000001540675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009003346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003410662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02187156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03633277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988436,0.000336295,0.000255868,0.000109953,0.0002244915,0.0002298653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994788,0.0001740094,0.0001410409,0.0001267634,0.00001282673,0.00006662405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003866071,0.00005913766,0.9872895,0.000001813906,0.00001087008,0.00001704873,0.0006305932,0.00212757,0.009227743,0.00001308643,0.00004428211,0.0001917162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003790242,0.0001711698,0.9809981,0.0000088468,0.00001022732,0.0001809482,0.00008368691,0.00002487019,0.01745087,0.00003809147,0.0005942379,0.00005993847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987538,0.0001825092,0.00003152089,0.0008361195,0.00007600967,0.0000648816,0.000002116908,0.00000193012,0.00005106923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992667,0.00002198059,0.00002491404,0.0006263907,0.00001851686,0.0000025424,1.766795e-7,0.000003226968,0.00003559044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01446122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006425154012955315,"score_gpt":0.2139444156680395,"score_spread":0.2075192616550842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}