{"id":"W2033519660","doi":"10.1115/omae2006-92591","title":"Design of Pressure Hulls Using Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hull; Finite element method; Navy; Submarine; Christian ministry; Joint (building); Nonlinear system; Naval architecture; Engineering; Computer science; Structural engineering; Limit analysis; Convex hull; Operations research; Marine engineering; Construction engineering; Mathematics; Regular polygon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006167875,0.0005445331,0.0004250637,0.0004986241,0.0003957498,0.0007209483,0.0007930566,0.0005831287,0.002732837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001218295,0.0004831122,0.0005478206,0.0001661219,0.0005626938,0.0006346587,0.000916974,0.0005401997,0.000909063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003643268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001768174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002462341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999637,0.00007627585,0.00002017854,0.00003622759,0.0001922408,0.00003814489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996303,0.0001228786,0.000050145,0.00004677154,0.0001195777,0.00003030088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008046984,0.00004738353,0.0009711368,0.0001176607,0.00001753067,0.0001072761,0.0001455916,0.9109772,0.02914868,0.00781519,0.0008113637,0.04976053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001100217,0.00006006133,0.0002346339,0.000009414312,0.000005242183,0.00002725119,0.00002635997,0.9904793,0.005028147,0.001224163,0.002884788,0.000009541013],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01704728,0.00004125563,0.9784063,0.00005819464,0.0000188528,0.00007581576,0.00004082413,0.0003335229,0.003977967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4722204,0.0002415671,0.5194651,0.00004941519,0.00001780643,0.0004251826,0.0002182706,0.0002041308,0.007158308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002732837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00914228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0174574281847606,"score_gpt":0.2367160107230774,"score_spread":0.2192585825383168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}