{"id":"W2033565928","doi":"10.1007/s00221-010-2419-8","title":"Using eye tracking to study numerical cognition: the case of the ratio effect","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Brain Research","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Numerical cognition; Arabic numerals; Magnitude (astronomy); Eye movement; Numerosity adaptation effect; Cognition; Eye tracking; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic; Neuroscience; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002750735,0.0001648838,0.0002379508,0.00007571446,0.0007065767,0.000105299,0.0004089378,0.00005311408,0.0007572147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003606068,0.00008947495,0.0001060147,0.0005789985,0.0002746384,0.00008892045,0.0006170729,0.000590249,0.00005988559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000491677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008091397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003937399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974887,0.0007595521,0.000337125,0.0002934792,0.0007520714,0.000369029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948456,0.004349194,0.00005981787,0.0004434876,0.0001778359,0.0001240549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002225947,0.003841418,0.001109252,0.00007880823,0.0001864401,0.0007015372,0.03007947,0.000001025481,0.9411329,0.01363824,0.002141443,0.006866866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009356476,0.0006044285,0.001208985,0.00007666722,0.00002002702,0.0003356137,0.01681396,0.0002064843,0.9682956,0.01126212,0.00005447266,0.0001859442],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938829,0.00001774636,0.0003104204,0.000810983,0.0001275079,0.00221971,0.000004658017,0.00002285911,0.002603191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973941,7.48364e-8,0.002019702,0.0001390512,0.0001070708,0.0001671108,6.447239e-7,0.00002719694,0.0001450921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02716274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.829097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1384607757774382,"score_gpt":0.4952688982914253,"score_spread":0.3568081225139871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}