{"id":"W2033831350","doi":"10.7202/800352ar","title":"Reading the Geology of Canada: Geological Discourse as Narrative","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Geological Society of London; American Association for the Advancement of Science","keywords":"Narrative; Stratigraphy; Argument (complex analysis); Foundation (evidence); Reading (process); Geology; History; Paleontology; Earth science; Archaeology; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art; Tectonics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003528186,0.0007294637,0.0005033296,0.004118915,0.03046748,0.02070699,0.002457364,0.004074464,0.006450785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024941,0.0003514822,0.0002081957,0.007789594,0.05008685,0.009140188,0.005420237,0.004505132,0.0003893161],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1287095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09897605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9666156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9657066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965043,0.001396969,0.00009507031,0.0002453576,0.001022158,0.0007361114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923698,0.004039783,0.0004940119,0.0002493768,0.001941477,0.0009054501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001783036,0.000008681871,0.0007434009,0.000090151,0.000005385183,0.0003779921,0.3462864,0.0004336014,0.0001647267,0.6155281,0.02734327,0.009000463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007527387,0.00000626579,0.001303866,0.0004373105,0.000009564674,0.0001110818,0.3460229,0.0005215356,0.000216915,0.07479537,0.5765125,0.00005516512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1069376,0.02732615,0.006997161,0.2525519,0.001636889,0.00008416543,0.0008693577,0.0001646919,0.6034321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649941,0.007285446,0.001449439,0.005104701,0.0001963269,0.00003804768,0.0001499623,0.00006093842,0.02072101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01218845784526778,"score_gpt":0.2292901947310094,"score_spread":0.2171017368857416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}