{"id":"W2033844168","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.4.555","title":"Ambiguity and the Equity of Rating Systems: United States Brokerage Firms, 1995–2000","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Intermediary; Underwriting; Equity (law); Business; Rating system; Accounting; Actuarial science; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005731216,0.0001519558,0.0001987443,0.001430687,0.0009583425,0.003362737,0.0005721432,0.0008247909,0.001147201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04460208,0.0001692369,0.0001353044,0.002125172,0.0009413254,0.002119421,0.001083543,0.001558904,0.0001662059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003322049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006111978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03193907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03664456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979473,0.0004346844,0.0002146482,0.0002030916,0.0008781031,0.0003222426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421802,0.01425236,0.03469814,0.00145617,0.005503329,0.001909935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004173146,0.0001569522,0.9681231,0.00001470586,0.00006009281,0.000144251,0.00266028,0.001221352,0.0003101257,0.006080183,0.002697527,0.01811398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002383871,0.00006587894,0.9919243,0.00002026173,0.000019085,0.00008267391,0.001194374,0.001982114,0.0003805438,0.0014603,0.002829106,0.00001753801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939601,0.0006178793,0.0002172816,0.0009442754,0.00001236102,0.000009810164,0.0001544503,0.000004238965,0.004079581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995091,0.00005452415,0.00003868517,0.00003301407,0.00001134436,0.000001561491,0.0001215,7.639092e-7,0.0002296345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03193907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06350631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03156842602508778,"score_gpt":0.2865257714969768,"score_spread":0.254957345471889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}