{"id":"W2033947970","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/301","title":"Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Jury; Constructive; Public health; Public opinion; Political science; Publics; Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Process (computing); Law; Medicine; Nursing; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636975,0.0000948232,0.0002048837,0.001785013,0.0008980794,0.000260187,0.0005182842,0.0003065877,0.0006513124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05318325,0.00008576573,0.00003987167,0.003409104,0.006979379,0.0006732825,0.00004408283,0.001086889,0.00002693399],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001325031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006225565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001094681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01729499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960782,0.00004227071,0.0003590457,0.0003918687,0.002479823,0.0006488179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943899,0.003277257,0.000110293,0.0003143626,0.0009269841,0.000981182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008853795,0.0001185025,0.0106239,0.0000437435,0.00001936283,0.00003999116,0.0003496605,8.041155e-7,0.001052755,0.9858543,0.0002122232,0.001675965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03222593,0.005585642,0.03215816,0.006631084,0.0003722084,0.001225171,0.1154218,0.1416962,0.008844766,0.6414799,0.01186716,0.002491941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2297394,0.00008217548,0.02356167,0.5784511,0.0005391521,0.0005837133,0.00002534292,0.0001721217,0.1668454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978421,0.0000972062,0.0008569533,0.001005649,0.00003552144,0.00000625467,0.000004461716,0.000008537914,0.0001433478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6234218180529332,"score_gpt":0.5204227652734262,"score_spread":0.1029990527795069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}