{"id":"W2034029932","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00994.x","title":"Use of Population Viability Analysis to Evaluate CITES Trade‐Management Options for Threatened Marine Fishes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"CITES; Threatened species; Population viability analysis; Population; Endangered species; Livelihood; Fishery; Seahorse; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Biology; Environmental science; Economics; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002733085,0.00009929942,0.00022859,0.00005122849,0.000163334,0.00001144314,0.0001011945,0.00007938231,0.0001637209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002820044,0.0000472559,0.0001283871,0.0007850327,0.00005290821,0.0001263212,0.00004130331,0.00002416362,0.000003401241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002428792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005983198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001712862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001864924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990129,0.0001161056,0.0003781129,0.0002630655,0.00008995865,0.000139799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.0006373913,0.0001499607,0.00009818593,0.0001498876,0.00004384118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000713491,0.00006448822,0.9712478,0.000006221465,0.0001293342,1.335117e-7,0.00003879868,0.0001419205,0.01150356,0.002644223,0.0004039127,0.01374828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001226353,0.0001695517,0.9885905,0.000002174587,0.0001567784,4.736232e-7,0.00002793651,0.004499493,0.0004727065,0.002976416,0.002884353,0.00009699282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903203,0.00000761423,0.001088686,0.007799329,0.00004432705,0.0005908344,0.00007270427,0.00003810435,0.00003808402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928316,0.00002629138,0.003711415,0.001236334,0.00003866599,0.0001263156,0.001857611,7.694736e-7,0.0001709525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01734271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2589346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1400056253911031,"score_gpt":0.2904863552467551,"score_spread":0.1504807298556521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}