{"id":"W2034195463","doi":"10.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.014","title":"Optimally chosen Nakajima–Zwanzig master equation for mean field approximation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics Letters A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Master equation; Projection (relational algebra); Diamond; Mean field theory; Mathematics; Operator (biology); Field (mathematics); Mathematical proof; Quantum; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical physics; Statistical physics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Pure mathematics; Chemistry; Geometry; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769155,0.001111854,0.003261153,0.001153277,0.001336263,0.003195012,0.003497506,0.003708688,0.005019959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005675847,0.000850127,0.001091333,0.00126652,0.003382617,0.00490339,0.002711155,0.003533394,0.0008075409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002384823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002144983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003944302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003612076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991618,0.0003312878,0.00003664978,0.0001032546,0.0002318161,0.0001351103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989392,0.000448739,0.0001149206,0.000185105,0.0001579741,0.0001539984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026579,0.00003645665,0.0002910262,0.00005529693,0.00002887839,0.0001169938,0.00006998671,0.03342594,0.001266381,0.9610254,0.001533892,0.002047181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005574464,0.00001340483,0.0001810106,0.00001474602,0.00001245335,0.0000458094,0.00003500995,0.4394257,0.0002445078,0.5593951,0.0005391745,0.00003733228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3767881,0.004064989,0.5024832,0.0106666,0.001253443,0.0002267934,0.0008954889,0.0005377989,0.1030836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8909957,0.001625338,0.06624065,0.001659209,0.0005893369,0.0003895069,0.0005357667,0.0004612593,0.03750319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005019959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01730323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03761983940044349,"score_gpt":0.2441794926354872,"score_spread":0.2065596532350437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}