{"id":"W2034201946","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2009.04.001","title":"The effectiveness of the VaR-based portfolio insurance strategy: An empirical analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Financial Analysis","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Downside risk; Portfolio insurance; Portfolio; Actuarial science; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Economics; Portfolio optimization; Replicating portfolio; Financial economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002470714,0.0001746456,0.0009204565,0.0004077691,0.0001353188,0.00003288734,0.0009336653,0.00006724428,0.0001018274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009287839,0.0001227927,0.001106923,0.005253272,0.0001132601,0.0001591711,0.00004259726,0.0001409906,0.00001206581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008404018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009084528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002942547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001521905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978773,0.000140008,0.001185999,0.0003650319,0.0002340156,0.0001976593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976175,0.0001342637,0.001078033,0.0006630897,0.0004674804,0.00003957767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001101881,0.0003357716,0.7833124,0.0002495837,0.001440265,0.000002627323,0.00001804778,0.005180961,0.00000882083,0.1911635,0.0001724227,0.01800542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782082,0.00006862408,0.9797389,0.0002257428,0.0006156345,1.478409e-7,0.000002222134,0.002577583,0.00008177392,0.008797395,0.007577688,0.0001360889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8676144,0.04856045,0.04673516,0.002522853,0.0009932211,0.001290787,0.00109405,0.00003651771,0.03115248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991588,0.007446525,0.00008724348,0.0006273905,0.0000547739,0.00002728749,0.00005527789,0.000005836414,0.0001076741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1964265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5007343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01948077864206694,"score_gpt":0.290571374526174,"score_spread":0.2710905958841071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}