{"id":"W2034225918","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.08.007","title":"Probabilistic ecological hazard assessment: Evaluating pharmaceutical effects on aquatic higher plants as an example","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Aquatic toxicology; Microcosm; Hazard analysis; Macrophyte; Toxicity; Toxicology; Hazard; Environmental science; Biology; Ecology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002250799,0.000756067,0.0007268795,0.0007805214,0.0004358832,0.001049624,0.0008820178,0.00124291,0.00176746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005786465,0.0003007878,0.001236635,0.0008652094,0.0005632098,0.0008783525,0.0006932429,0.0007073945,0.0001309171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00104862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001017352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00901589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00823731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991597,0.0004853749,0.00002489957,0.00009416018,0.0001792446,0.00005668254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937003,0.005395833,0.000397596,0.0001571296,0.0002731137,0.00007601239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324167,0.00008198891,0.002876356,0.00008547258,0.00006920196,0.00007555996,0.00002516261,0.9769389,0.001825438,0.003148686,0.0001755361,0.0145653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000378535,0.0003704907,0.002500746,0.000008204721,0.00009724739,0.0001330914,0.00003815857,0.9818227,0.002221206,0.01231814,0.0004291575,0.0000228914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6452563,0.001689751,0.3437652,0.000881631,0.00002931698,0.0001748393,0.0007518416,0.0002335792,0.007217505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624853,0.0006986303,0.03482468,0.00006226271,0.00002254344,0.00009325257,0.00022015,0.0000266926,0.001566551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00901589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01792681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04972917192484915,"score_gpt":0.3435692672682469,"score_spread":0.2938400953433977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}