{"id":"W2034263688","doi":"10.3129/i10-061","title":"A Canadian population-based study of vision problems: Assessing the significance of socioeconomic status","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; Public Health Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Visual impairment; Medicine; Population; Multinomial logistic regression; Logistic regression; Glaucoma; Cross-sectional study; Optometry; Demography; Gerontology; Environmental health; Ophthalmology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007085096,0.0001463133,0.0005394205,0.0004853507,0.0002275321,0.00001316382,0.000195886,0.0001555715,0.0008159495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002847031,0.0001094012,0.0001102336,0.0001517948,0.0002477366,0.0001016513,0.000009497458,0.0005195196,0.000003136227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002510881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004170701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3930333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1810429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984666,0.0001747001,0.0006865745,0.0001469477,0.0001185426,0.0004067117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979994,0.0002598065,0.0006051178,0.0002480054,0.0003559174,0.0005318099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003757723,0.0002016764,0.9970827,0.00005377449,0.0001436699,0.0008094666,0.0008792203,0.0001616325,0.0004076957,0.00003026708,0.00008732846,0.0001049568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052284,0.003588831,0.9885969,0.00005788822,0.0001203836,0.004416328,0.001762196,0.00005153269,0.00005492572,0.0001682762,0.00004575709,0.00008474798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968067,0.0001402052,0.00000162526,0.0009772172,0.0006096461,0.0004686878,0.00001871651,0.000001468928,0.0009757644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999617,6.150863e-7,0.0001397118,0.00005187,0.00007850185,0.000007236783,0.00000540761,0.00001666295,0.00008301525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2119905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8934075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03090349302296149,"score_gpt":0.3599333893053966,"score_spread":0.3290298962824352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}