{"id":"W2034312826","doi":"10.1016/j.automatica.2012.08.044","title":"On consensus algorithms design for double integrator dynamics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Automatica","topic":"Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Double integrator; Integrator; Ideal (ethics); Control theory (sociology); Consensus; Consensus algorithm; Multi-agent system; Computer science; State (computer science); Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Control (management); Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007037395,0.0001973609,0.0002638807,0.00008183137,0.0001307862,0.0001585991,0.0006307999,0.0000943818,0.000008903671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002124382,0.000165872,0.00009831467,0.0002142257,0.00003586187,0.0001957973,0.00006853559,0.0001104824,0.0003660685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001810926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007217423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001476547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001879146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984603,0.0001126792,0.0003362287,0.0002651192,0.0002707867,0.0005549085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981112,0.0008702149,0.0001410307,0.0005705901,0.0001061852,0.0002007258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004925652,0.0003825526,0.000114346,0.00006117881,0.0001303495,0.000007439865,0.000601038,0.0004764708,0.0002385315,0.9517688,0.01721181,0.02895823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001353919,0.0001541041,0.0001457236,0.00003427278,0.00001772072,0.0000155109,0.00004821413,0.9925712,0.0008637554,0.002706513,0.001870352,0.0002186752],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002431906,0.00005038514,0.9926888,0.0007646482,0.001077217,0.000940859,0.00002407457,0.0006179332,0.001404217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8301954,5.170888e-7,0.1688415,0.0001871467,0.00009105664,0.0002536283,0.0000154319,0.00001976044,0.0003955561],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6764065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04103071042194741,"score_gpt":0.2843955446725792,"score_spread":0.2433648342506317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}