{"id":"W2034316025","doi":"10.1063/1.1630566","title":"A different approach for calculating Franck–Condon factors including anharmonicity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Molecular spectroscopy and chirality","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Anharmonicity; Truncation (statistics); Perturbation (astronomy); Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics); Basis (linear algebra); Set (abstract data type); Basis set; Applied mathematics; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Physics; Computational chemistry; Computer science; Chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Molecule; Geometry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001803157,0.001744812,0.001612003,0.002153145,0.001999723,0.001587866,0.004035356,0.001849699,0.009831708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003046608,0.0006349286,0.001682054,0.001544623,0.0006380359,0.002011057,0.001093326,0.00531475,0.003231019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003187867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006359456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009910534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.0002566023,0.00009789374,0.0001602067,0.0006746897,0.00009106704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981543,0.0004205214,0.00007774715,0.0006210309,0.0006275412,0.00009883654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002395829,0.0006263452,0.001252753,0.00155284,0.0006231009,0.0008260207,0.0007419291,0.08789727,0.0872015,0.5034077,0.01854662,0.2970844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000232105,0.0004650077,0.001770386,0.0002252617,0.0002665113,0.001417384,0.0002026758,0.6264824,0.09928689,0.163814,0.1051378,0.0006996408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00592699,0.0003341903,0.9839262,0.0002975756,0.0005335478,0.0002421657,0.0004683353,0.001064583,0.007206343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06544136,0.0008080531,0.9135767,0.0005061835,0.0001506848,0.0009026222,0.0006695189,0.00112137,0.01682354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009831708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03289032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03931546502639163,"score_gpt":0.2849052884898016,"score_spread":0.2455898234634099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}