{"id":"W2034316025","doi":"10.1063/1.1630566","title":"A different approach for calculating Franck–Condon factors including anharmonicity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Molecular spectroscopy and chirality","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Anharmonicity; Truncation (statistics); Perturbation (astronomy); Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics); Basis (linear algebra); Set (abstract data type); Basis set; Applied mathematics; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Physics; Computational chemistry; Computer science; Chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Molecule; Geometry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002258224,0.0001740676,0.0003139301,0.000007939758,0.0001046069,0.00002188545,0.0002697569,0.00008142605,0.00003248602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001491584,0.0001076617,0.0002904075,0.00006421738,0.00006356143,0.00006326634,0.00004016246,0.0004939733,2.522204e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008761782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002801899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002962657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.065693e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989656,0.00004146566,0.0003634172,0.0001074431,0.000277556,0.0002445246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.0001861196,0.0003632602,0.0002026275,0.00007571458,0.00009062186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006783209,0.0001642563,0.0008334353,0.0000869077,0.00008472869,4.875855e-7,0.0003894437,0.0001012562,0.9972864,0.0007838712,0.00005080612,0.0001505999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005995735,0.0000193335,0.00003140906,0.00002857652,0.0001055958,0.00000996684,0.0001073371,0.0009011208,0.9908523,0.007126205,0.00009328739,0.0001252779],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9500913,0.0001388978,0.04738005,0.00002244778,0.00003952928,0.00005208814,0.000005868384,0.00001072408,0.002259097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982754,0.000006734751,0.001373003,0.00004784166,0.0002522737,0.000002147877,0.000005390114,0.00002042239,0.00001680065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04818409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4390317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03931546502639163,"score_gpt":0.2849052884898016,"score_spread":0.2455898234634099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}