{"id":"W2034407313","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00276.x","title":"Utility of Dynamic‐Landscape Metapopulation Models for Sustainable Forest Management","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Metapopulation; Forest management; Silviculture; Geography; Population; Ecology; Sustainability; Logging; Sustainable forest management; Environmental resource management; Salvage logging; Sustainable management; Environmental science; Forestry; Habitat; Snag","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004206697,0.0000819042,0.0001418287,0.00004246622,0.00006139475,0.000006326226,0.0001194122,0.00007156389,0.0002057671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004529255,0.00007586057,0.00004308792,0.0001309699,0.00006258023,0.0002349217,0.00006946172,0.00002619943,0.00002352117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005662128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005246895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003538459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000925726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992067,0.00006052913,0.0002593581,0.0002169399,0.00006225774,0.0001942606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995178,0.00008721,0.0001350975,0.0002030961,0.00003008165,0.0000266972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000217589,0.0002263631,0.8354386,0.0003252178,0.00008158815,0.000001216897,0.0001979826,0.01581035,0.002215126,0.0734637,0.009960665,0.06206159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003650333,0.00005125209,0.1736607,0.000003348127,0.00001429434,6.779135e-7,0.00005018614,0.8019056,0.0001256988,0.009239446,0.01451037,0.00007333214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123519,0.00004846427,0.07987009,0.0007253921,0.0000615832,0.0009442358,0.00001005932,0.00003601969,0.005952227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933794,0.000005668154,0.005122628,0.0001671046,0.00001102033,0.000092271,0.0001048084,0.000006983929,0.001110138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7860953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3093504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01419243973186722,"score_gpt":0.2467030586558183,"score_spread":0.2325106189239511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}